Talk:Current events - Revision history

Trinexx at 05:26, 5 November 2006

2006-11-05T05:26:22Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:26, 5 November 2006
Line 1:	Line 1:
		* I feel that I should mention that the templates "!" and "!-" should be useless now. For some reason, the Iteminfo template wouldn't recognize it... --[[User:Trinexx\|Trinexx]] 00:26, 5 November 2006 (EST)

Poromenos at 18:30, 15 September 2005

2005-09-15T18:30:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 15 September 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Currently the [[Special:Categories\|categories]] are listed like so:~~

	~~\|_ Items Classes _\|~~
	~~\|_ Light Mage_\|~~
	~~\|_ The Unholy Symbol of the Damned _\|~~

	When skills are added, each skill should be under its corresponding class and under the Skills category. This presents a problem, because the skills category must also be further split into subcategories by class.

	What do we do? Do we add all skills under the class category and the skills category? Then we would have a huge list of skills and equipment under the Mage category and a jumbled mess of skills from all classes under the Skills category.

	Do we create separate categories, i.e. "Mage items" and "Mage skills"? Then each skill would be under its own class category and each item would be under its own category as well. Perhaps also the "Mage" category would have the "Mage items" and "Mage skills" subcategories. This would have a lot of Category tags in each item. A way for each category to display all its subitems would be nice. Until I find one, please post here alternate ideas on categories. Personally, I vote for this, the separation of items and skills. Also, I don't think skills and items should be added under the "Mage" category, although "Mage" will have "Mage skills" and "Mage equipment" as subcategories. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 19:21, 12 September 2005 (CDT)

	~~This is a rough draft of my proposition, and I think this is what makes most sense (legend: C = Category, P = Page, categories that don't have an Item/Skill in them only point to subcategories):~~

	~~[[Image:Categorization.png\|600px]]~~

	~~== Categorisation ==~~

	~~Logical and looking great.~~

	~~So basically:~~

	~~Genres --> Classes --> Class_Skills <-- Skills~~
	~~--> Class_Items <-- Items~~

	* Indeed. So, since everyone agrees, I have amended the "item" template so we can start IDing and adding items. If Tsoraak has a current ID list, (i.e. postshat) I could maybe write a script to create all the items, so it would be mostly copy/paste, but the work can begin. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 05:51, 14 September 2005 (CDT)

	* Sorry, my post-shat equip id list is VERY incomplete. I presume you want the info in a single text file. If you want my item list, e-mail me or post here and let me know how you want the additional info like mob, pop, and area included for each item. [[User:Tsoraak\|Tsoraak]] 10:00 15 September 2005 (EDT)

	** It doesn't matter if it's incomplete, at this stage we just need items. I don't care how the text files are, as long as they are separated by area OR the area is in the ID. Also, the mob should be in the ID as well. I believe your current setup is thus:
	~~Object 'blabla' is something...~~
	~~Blabla~~
	~~Mob This~~
	~~Area That~~
	So just adding "Pop Yes", "Manufactured Yes", "OOG Yes" on the bottom of each one is sufficient. If you want, you can choose a default and the script i will make can assume it's not, for example, OOG if there is no OOG Yes, so you don't have to type "OOG No" or "Pop No" on each item, I can do that automatically.

Poromenos: /* Categorisation */

2005-09-15T14:04:00Z

Categorisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 15 September 2005
Line 27:		Line 27:

	* Sorry, my post-shat equip id list is VERY incomplete. I presume you want the info in a single text file. If you want my item list, e-mail me or post here and let me know how you want the additional info like mob, pop, and area included for each item. [[User:Tsoraak\|Tsoraak]] 10:00 15 September 2005 (EDT)		* Sorry, my post-shat equip id list is VERY incomplete. I presume you want the info in a single text file. If you want my item list, e-mail me or post here and let me know how you want the additional info like mob, pop, and area included for each item. [[User:Tsoraak\|Tsoraak]] 10:00 15 September 2005 (EDT)

			** It doesn't matter if it's incomplete, at this stage we just need items. I don't care how the text files are, as long as they are separated by area OR the area is in the ID. Also, the mob should be in the ID as well. I believe your current setup is thus:
			Object 'blabla' is something...
			Blabla
			Mob This
			Area That
			So just adding "Pop Yes", "Manufactured Yes", "OOG Yes" on the bottom of each one is sufficient. If you want, you can choose a default and the script i will make can assume it's not, for example, OOG if there is no OOG Yes, so you don't have to type "OOG No" or "Pop No" on each item, I can do that automatically.

Tsoraak at 14:00, 15 September 2005

2005-09-15T14:00:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 15 September 2005
Line 25:		Line 25:

	* Indeed. So, since everyone agrees, I have amended the "item" template so we can start IDing and adding items. If Tsoraak has a current ID list, (i.e. postshat) I could maybe write a script to create all the items, so it would be mostly copy/paste, but the work can begin. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 05:51, 14 September 2005 (CDT)		* Indeed. So, since everyone agrees, I have amended the "item" template so we can start IDing and adding items. If Tsoraak has a current ID list, (i.e. postshat) I could maybe write a script to create all the items, so it would be mostly copy/paste, but the work can begin. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 05:51, 14 September 2005 (CDT)

			* Sorry, my post-shat equip id list is VERY incomplete. I presume you want the info in a single text file. If you want my item list, e-mail me or post here and let me know how you want the additional info like mob, pop, and area included for each item. [[User:Tsoraak\|Tsoraak]] 10:00 15 September 2005 (EDT)

Poromenos: /* Categorisation */

2005-09-14T10:51:44Z

Categorisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 14 September 2005
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Genres --> Classes --> Class_Skills <-- Skills		Genres --> Classes --> Class_Skills <-- Skills
	--> Class_Items <-- Items		--> Class_Items <-- Items

			* Indeed. So, since everyone agrees, I have amended the "item" template so we can start IDing and adding items. If Tsoraak has a current ID list, (i.e. postshat) I could maybe write a script to create all the items, so it would be mostly copy/paste, but the work can begin. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 05:51, 14 September 2005 (CDT)

Mezzanine: /* Categorisation */

2005-09-14T06:25:41Z

Categorisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 14 September 2005
Line 21:		Line 21:
	So basically:		So basically:

	Genres --> Classes --> Class_Skills <-- Skills		Genres --> Classes --> Class_Skills <-- Skills
	--> Class_Items <-- Items		--> Class_Items <-- Items

Mezzanine: Categorisation

2005-09-14T06:25:24Z

Categorisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 14 September 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[Image:Categorization.png\|600px]]		[[Image:Categorization.png\|600px]]

			== Categorisation ==

			Logical and looking great.

			So basically:

			Genres --> Classes --> Class_Skills <-- Skills
			--> Class_Items <-- Items

Poromenos at 00:36, 14 September 2005

2005-09-14T00:36:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 14 September 2005
Line 9:		Line 9:
	What do we do? Do we add all skills under the class category and the skills category? Then we would have a huge list of skills and equipment under the Mage category and a jumbled mess of skills from all classes under the Skills category.		What do we do? Do we add all skills under the class category and the skills category? Then we would have a huge list of skills and equipment under the Mage category and a jumbled mess of skills from all classes under the Skills category.

	Do we create separate categories, i.e. "Mage items" and "Mage skills"? Then each skill would be under its own class category and each item would be under its own category as well. Perhaps also the "Mage" category would have the "Mage items" and "Mage skills" subcategories. This would have a lot f Category tags in each item. A way for each category to display all its subitems would be nice. Until I find one, please post here alternate ideas on categories. Personally, I vote for this, the separation of items and skills. Also, I don't think skills and items should be added under the "Mage" category, although "Mage" will have "Mage skills" and "Mage equipment" as subcategories. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 19:21, 12 September 2005 (CDT)		Do we create separate categories, i.e. "Mage items" and "Mage skills"? Then each skill would be under its own class category and each item would be under its own category as well. Perhaps also the "Mage" category would have the "Mage items" and "Mage skills" subcategories. This would have a lot of Category tags in each item. A way for each category to display all its subitems would be nice. Until I find one, please post here alternate ideas on categories. Personally, I vote for this, the separation of items and skills. Also, I don't think skills and items should be added under the "Mage" category, although "Mage" will have "Mage skills" and "Mage equipment" as subcategories. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 19:21, 12 September 2005 (CDT)

	This is a rough draft of my proposition, and I think this is what makes most sense (legend: C = Category, P = Page, categories that don't have an Item/Skill in them only point to subcategories):		This is a rough draft of my proposition, and I think this is what makes most sense (legend: C = Category, P = Page, categories that don't have an Item/Skill in them only point to subcategories):

	[[Image:Categorization.png\|600px]]		[[Image:Categorization.png\|600px]]

Poromenos at 00:31, 14 September 2005

2005-09-14T00:31:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 14 September 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:
	When skills are added, each skill should be under its corresponding class and under the Skills category. This presents a problem, because the skills category must also be further split into subcategories by class.		When skills are added, each skill should be under its corresponding class and under the Skills category. This presents a problem, because the skills category must also be further split into subcategories by class.

	~~This presents a problem.~~ What do we do? Do we add all skills under the class category and the skills category? Then we would have a huge list of skills and equipment under the Mage category and a jumbled mess of skills from all classes under the Skills category.		What do we do? Do we add all skills under the class category and the skills category? Then we would have a huge list of skills and equipment under the Mage category and a jumbled mess of skills from all classes under the Skills category.

	Do we create separate categories, i.e. "Mage items" and "Mage skills"? Then each skill would be under its own class category and each item would be under its own category as well. Perhaps also the "Mage" category would have the "Mage items" and "Mage skills" subcategories. This would have a lot f Category tags in each item. A way for each category to display all its subitems would be nice. Until I find one, please post here alternate ideas on categories. Personally, I vote for this, the separation of items and skills. Also, I don't think skills and items should be added under the "Mage" category, although "Mage" will have "Mage skills" and "Mage equipment" as subcategories. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 19:21, 12 September 2005 (CDT)		Do we create separate categories, i.e. "Mage items" and "Mage skills"? Then each skill would be under its own class category and each item would be under its own category as well. Perhaps also the "Mage" category would have the "Mage items" and "Mage skills" subcategories. This would have a lot f Category tags in each item. A way for each category to display all its subitems would be nice. Until I find one, please post here alternate ideas on categories. Personally, I vote for this, the separation of items and skills. Also, I don't think skills and items should be added under the "Mage" category, although "Mage" will have "Mage skills" and "Mage equipment" as subcategories. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 19:21, 12 September 2005 (CDT)

Poromenos at 13:18, 13 September 2005

2005-09-13T13:18:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 13 September 2005
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Do we create separate categories, i.e. "Mage items" and "Mage skills"? Then each skill would be under its own class category and each item would be under its own category as well. Perhaps also the "Mage" category would have the "Mage items" and "Mage skills" subcategories. This would have a lot f Category tags in each item. A way for each category to display all its subitems would be nice. Until I find one, please post here alternate ideas on categories. Personally, I vote for this, the separation of items and skills. Also, I don't think skills and items should be added under the "Mage" category, although "Mage" will have "Mage skills" and "Mage equipment" as subcategories. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 19:21, 12 September 2005 (CDT)		Do we create separate categories, i.e. "Mage items" and "Mage skills"? Then each skill would be under its own class category and each item would be under its own category as well. Perhaps also the "Mage" category would have the "Mage items" and "Mage skills" subcategories. This would have a lot f Category tags in each item. A way for each category to display all its subitems would be nice. Until I find one, please post here alternate ideas on categories. Personally, I vote for this, the separation of items and skills. Also, I don't think skills and items should be added under the "Mage" category, although "Mage" will have "Mage skills" and "Mage equipment" as subcategories. [[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 19:21, 12 September 2005 (CDT)

	This is a rough draft of my proposition, and I think this is what makes most sense:		This is a rough draft of my proposition, and I think this is what makes most sense (legend: C = Category, P = Page, categories that don't have an Item/Skill in them only point to subcategories):

	[[Image:Categorization.png\|600px]]		[[Image:Categorization.png\|600px]]